Jump to:Page Content
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
The Harvard Family Research Project separated from the Harvard Graduate School of Education to become the Global Family Research Project as of January 1, 2017. It is no longer affiliated with Harvard University.
Volume X, Number 4, Winter 2004/2005
Issue Topic: Evaluating Family Involvement Programs
Beyond Basic Training
M. Elena Lopez of HFRP interprets themes from a participatory evaluation and parent engagement institute.
What matters in family support evaluation? In September 2004, researchers, evaluators, practitioners, and parent leaders gathered at the Ewing Marion Kauffman Conference Center in Kansas City, Missouri, to examine evaluation approaches that meet the information needs of various stakeholders and uphold family support principles. Convened by Family Support America, the Participatory Evaluation and Parent Engagement Institute created a forum to discuss the strengths, challenges, and new directions of family support evaluations.
The Institute highlighted programs that conduct family support evaluations in alignment with family support principles. Participatory evaluation in particular reflects several family support principles, among them building the skills of families and forming relationships based on equality and respect. Institute presenters, which included parent leaders, staff members, and evaluators, shared lessons from parents’ involvement in evaluation:
Related ResourcesThe Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health trains families in evaluation skills. Resources include a website on families in evaluation and articles in the evaluation newsletter Data Matters. www.ffcmh.org/evaluation.htm Slaton, A. E. (2003). A family perspective on evidence-based practices. Data Matters, 6, 17, 23. gucchd.georgetown.edu/files/ |
Although family support has grown over the last three decades, it is fragile. Programs tend to be underfunded and to lack capacity to deliver quality services. Evaluation can help family support achieve its vision of a high quality, sustainable system of care for children, youth, and families. Although no one evaluation methodology fulfills this function, several evaluation approaches can build a strong case for the direction and strategy of the field—particularly urgent, as the field operates in a policy environment of competing social programs and scarce resources. In addition, family support evaluation must meet stringent criteria of -evidence-based practice and build a learning system that connects evaluation stakeholders at different decision-making levels.
To tackle these challenges, Heather Weiss, of Harvard Family Research Project, urged Institute participants to implement a comprehensive evaluation strategy. As the Institute’s final keynote, this strategy connected several strands of the various presentations and included four components:
Drawing on the wisdom of over two decades of practice, the family support field must now position itself to act on the demands for research-based programs and evidence about the benefits of family support.
¹ The principles that guide the research of Denver’s Community Learning Network can be found at www.aecf.org/initiatives/ldu/strategies/denver_principles.htm.
M. Elena Lopez, Senior Consultant, HFRP