Jump to:Page Content
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
The Harvard Family Research Project separated from the Harvard Graduate School of Education to become the Global Family Research Project as of January 1, 2017. It is no longer affiliated with Harvard University.
June 17, 2002 Teaching for the Commonwealth: Linking Schools With CommunitiesJohn Wallace, Nan Kari, Sara Carpenter
|
This course is taught at the Jane Addams School of Democracy at a summer institute for teachers, who can obtain graduate credit from the College of Continuing Education at the University of Minnesota.
Faculty:
John Wallace, University of MinnesotaIntroduction: The Commonwealth Tradition
The American commonwealth history and cluster of associated concepts will be woven into the framework of this course. The commonwealth tradition offers a lens that can help us to understand education from a slightly different angle. The term commonwealth can sound abstract, but it once conveyed quite the reverse. It was grounded in practical, cooperative work and local self-interests. It suggested that ordinary people were “civic producers” who built the nation—the social and material culture—through their labors. People gained authority by creating and sustaining the “commons”: public schools, libraries, parks, public art projects, and voluntary fire departments. Education saw its broad purpose as preparing young people for a productive, engaged citizenship. Schools, integral to community life, were often understood as “civic spaces” where parents, educators, and other citizens could solve problems and influence the education of their children. The commonwealth tradition that created a link between people's productive work and ownership in democracy lent public dimensions to occupations. One could be a citizen teacher, a citizen business owner, or citizen nurse.
Today, civic themes once again resonate in K–2 and higher education. Parents seek greater access to schools and many teachers welcome the support of parents. Neighborhoods too want an ownership in local schools. Yet a serious gap exists. Schools are often isolated from the communities in which they live. Teachers struggle with multiple constraints and a system of accountability based on students' test scores. Parents, especially new immigrants, express frustration in learning the system and finding meaningful ways to engage in shared problem solving. In a time of widespread cynicism about public education and growing frustration on the part of educators, students, and parents alike, the commonwealth tradition provides a resource to think differently about education in a democratic society.¹
Course Summary
This intensive, field-based course will examine broad strategies to link schools with communities to improve access, expand the learning resources, and strengthen or create structures that make formal and informal learning contiguous. An attentiveness to neighborhood as “place” will include the history of the West Side, discussion of the public work initiatives underway, and interaction with neighborhood resource people. Participants in the course will have opportunity to reflect on their teaching as vocation and the civic dimensions of teacher. Learners will apply best practices in experiential education in the design, implementation, and assessment of their community-based learning projects. They will learn to use the West Side database to help identify community learning opportunities and resource people. Community leaders, high school age and younger students, and parents will serve as teaching resources for the seminar. And participants will engage in and critique interactive pedagogies drawn, in part, from popular education philosophy and methodologies.
Format
The course will include a five-day intensive seminar in June, followed by three full-day seminars throughout the academic year. It will conclude with a public presentation of the learning projects and shared critical reflection on outcomes.
The short-term experience will incorporate a pedagogy that emphasizes structural analysis and critical reflection. Students also will examine the lenses through which they understand the world and will be encouraged to recognize the legitimacy of other worldviews and sources of knowledge. Critical reflection requires that students identify the limits of their own perspectives and helps to facilitate thinking from other points of view.
Course Objectives
General
The course will:
Specific
Learners will:
Course Outcomes:
Context and Location:
The course is located in St. Paul's West Side neighborhood and uses local neighborhood organizations as classroom space. Field speakers will include students, parents, and community leaders representing the ethnic diversity of the West Side. Learners will interact with public artists whose work is represented on the West Side, local historians, and storytellers to learn about the “place” in which they teach.
Required Readings:
Course Requirements, Evaluation, and Grading Guidelines
Two assumptions form the core of the course philosophy: the student is a partner in the learning process, and knowledge is not passed from instructor to student, but is advanced through the students' shared contributions and engagement in the social process of learning. Therefore, students are evaluated for participation and their contribution to the group.
Student participation is valued as a key aspect of this pedagogical project. It is a way to see the student's involvement in the learning experience, their evolution, and their desire to contribute to the learning of the group. Student engagement in and contribution to the learning community are especially important given the program themes including citizenship and democracy building. The community-based projects reflect the students' capacity to integrate theoretical understanding with practice. Students will be evaluated on the following: active participation in the seminars, design and assessment of the curriculum project, and final reflective paper. Grades will be assigned on successful completion of the final paper.
Curriculum project – 50%
Final reflective paper – 30%
Participation – 20%
¹ For discussion of this as a coherent political tradition, see for instance, Commonwealth: A Return to Citizen Politics (Free Press, 1990) and Building America: The Democratic Promise of Public Work (Temple Press, 1996).
Free. Available online only.