You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.

www.HFRP.org

The Harvard Family Research Project separated from the Harvard Graduate School of Education to become the Global Family Research Project as of January 1, 2017. It is no longer affiliated with Harvard University.

Terms of Use ▼


Program Description

Overview The San Diego “6 to 6” Extended School Day Program is designed to provide access to high quality, affordable enrichment programs before and after school to every elementary and middle school student in the city of San Diego, California. The program is designed to provide a safe place for students while their parents are at work, one that is both academically enriching and recreationally stimulating.
Start Date 1998
Scope local
Type after school, before school
Location urban
Setting public school
Participants kindergarten through middle school students
Number of Sites/Grantees The city has contracted with 15 community-based organizations to operate 196 sites for the school year, where each site serves 85–100 elementary students or 100–300 middle school students. There is a 3-year grant length for state and federal funds, while local funds are renewed annually.
Number Served 25,000 (2000–2001)
Components Community-based organizations in partnership with public schools operate the daily program, which consists of academic enrichment, youth development activities, creative and performing arts, leadership opportunities, and community service activities.
Funding Level $16.95 million (FY 2002). The California After School Learning and Safe Neighborhoods Partnership program contributes $8.5 million dollars annually for the duration of its 3-year grant, the city contributed an additional $6.1 million (FY 2002), and the federal government, through the 21st Century Community Learning Centers funds, contributed $2.35 million (FY 2002).
Funding Sources city of San Diego, state of California (After School Learning and Safe Neighborhoods Partnerships Program), and federal government (21st Century Community Learning Centers program)


Evaluation

Overview Two evaluations of San Diego's “6 to 6” program have been conducted. The first evaluation, conducted by WestEd, examined the health and safety of the program and complaint procedures; the evaluators also analyzed existing satisfaction surveys. The second evaluation, conducted by Hoffman, Clark & Associates, examined the academic performance of San Diego's “6 to 6” program participants.
Evaluator WestEd and Hoffman, Clark & Associates
Evaluations Profiled San Diego After School Regional Consortium: Academic Indicator Report 1999–2000 (July 2001)

Independent Evaluation of San Diego's “6 to 6” Extended School Day Program: Final Report (January 2002)
Evaluations Planned San Diego After School Regional Consortium: Academic Indicator Report 2000–01
Report Availability Hoffman, J. (2001, July). San Diego After School Regional Consortium: Academic indicator report 1999–2000. San Diego, CA: Hoffman, Clark & Associates.

McCormick, T., Bojorquez, J. C., & Tushnet, N. (2002). Independent evaluation of San Diego's “6 to 6” Extended School Day Program: Final report. Los Alamitos, CA: WestED.

McCormick, T., Bojorquez, J. C., & Tushnet, N. (2001). Independent evaluation of San Diego's “6 to 6” Extended School Day Program: Interim report. Los Alamitos, CA: WestED.


Contacts

Evaluation Joann Hoffman, M.P.H.
Hoffman, Clark & Associates
731 South Highway 101, Suite #11
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Email: sbhca@pacbell.net

Treseen McCormick
Project Director
WestEd
4665 Lampson Avenue
Los Alamitos, CA 90720
Tel: 562-799-5169
Fax: 562-799-5151
Email: tmccorm@wested.org
Program Steven Amick
“6 to 6” Program Administrator
1200 Third Avenue, Suite 1300
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: 619-236-6312
Email: samick@sandiego.gov

Deb Ferrin
Child Care Coordinator
1200 Third Avenue, Suite 1300
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: 619-533-6511
Email: dferrin@sandiego.gov
Profile Updated June 13, 2003

Evaluation 1 (Hoffman, Clark & Associates): San Diego After School Regional Consortium: Academic Indicator Report 1999–2000



Evaluation Description

Evaluation Purpose To determine if San Diego's “6 to 6” program improved participants' academic performance.
Evaluation Design Quasi-Experimental: Data were collected from a random sample of program participants (n = 187) prior to the program year and after the program year. The study matched students' baseline academic indicators to follow-up academic indicators and conducted a pretest/posttest analysis. After matching pairs of pretests and posttests, the final sample included a total of 142 students.
Data Collection Methods Secondary Source/Data Review: School attendance data were collected from students in Grades 4–8 at the end of the year prior to the current year of after school program participation (baseline) and at the end of the school year following the current year of after school program participation (follow-up).

Tests/Assessments: SAT-9 reading and math scores were collected from students in Grades 4–8 at the end of the year prior to the current year of after school program participation (baseline) and at the end of the school year following the current year of after school program participation (follow-up).
Data Collection Timeframe Baseline data were collected in 1999 and follow-up data were collected in 2000.


Findings:
Summative/Outcome Findings

Academic Fifty-seven percent of sampled students increased their reading score over the year. Forty-four percent of students increased their SAT-9 math score from the baseline to the follow-up year.

There were statistically significant increases in SAT-9 reading scores from the baseline to the follow-up measurement (p < .01). More specifically, 64.3% of participants were above the 25th percentile in 1999, while 70.6% were above the 25th percentile in 2000, a 9.8% increase.

Over 2% more children scored above the 25th percentile in SAT-9 Math scores in 2000 than had in 1999, a total increase of 4% (although this difference was not statistically significant).

School attendance increased by 1 day and absences decreased by 1 day for sampled students from the baseline to the follow-up year. This change was not statistically significant.

© 2016 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College
Published by Harvard Family Research Project