Jump to:Page Content
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
The Harvard Family Research Project separated from the Harvard Graduate School of Education to become the Global Family Research Project as of January 1, 2017. It is no longer affiliated with Harvard University.
Program Description
Overview | The LA’s BEST (Better Educated Students for Tomorrow) Program is an afterschool program that serves elementary-school-aged youth in Los Angeles, California. The program provides youth with a safe environment, enhanced opportunities through integrated educational supports, educational enrichment activities to supplement and deepen the regular program, recreational activities, and interpersonal skills and self-esteem development. |
Start Date | 1988 |
Scope | local |
Type | afterschool |
Location | urban |
Setting | public schools |
Participants | elementary school students |
Number of Sites/Grantees | 186 elementary schools |
Number Served | 28,000 per year |
Components | The program is available from the end of the school day until 6 pm, Monday through Friday, at no cost to parents. In addition, numerous citywide events and field trips are scheduled on weekends. To attend, youth must enroll in the program and are expected to participate on a regular basis. |
Funding Level | $36 million (2009–2010) |
Funding Sources | City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Unified School District, private sector, private foundations, 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) program, California Department of Education, other federal grants, and private individuals |
Evaluation
Overview | Beginning in the 1989–90 school year, a series of evaluation studies has been conducted that examine the program’s implementation and impact. |
Evaluator(s) | Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California, Los Angeles |
Evaluations Profiled | Evaluation Report, March 1, 1990 Evaluation Report, July 31, 1991 Final Evaluation Report, December 17, 1993 Final Evaluation Report: Longitudinal Study, 1992–94 The impact of the LA’s BEST after school enrichment initiative on subsequent student achievement and performance Examining the Relationship between Afterschool Staff-Based Social Capital and Student Engagement in LA’s BEST Exploring the Relationships between LA’s BEST Program Attendance and Cognitive Gains of LA’s BEST Students Exploring the Effect of Afterschool Participation on Students’ Collaboration Skills, Oral Communication Skills, and Self-Efficacy |
Evaluations Planned | The Center for the Study of Evaluation team continues to evaluate the role of LA’s BEST in supporting youth’s academic and social development. The Center is currently conducting an exploratory study on the first year of LA’s BEST summer schools’ impact on language development—due June 30, 2012. |
Report Availability |
Brooks, P. E., Valdes, R. M., Herman, J. L., & Baker, E. L. (1990). Evaluation report, March 1, 1990: LA’s BEST after school education and enrichment program. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California–Los Angeles. Huang, D., Coordt, A., La Torre, D., Leon, S., Miyoshi, J., Pérez, P., & Peterson, C. (2007). The afterschool hours: Examining the relationship between afterschool staff-based social capital and student engagement in LA’s BEST (CSE Technical Report 712). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R712.pdf Huang, D., Leon, S., Hodson, C., La Torre, D., Obregon, N., & Rivera, G. (2010). Preparing students for the 21st Century: Exploring the effect of afterschool participation on students’ collaboration skills, oral communication skills, and self-efficacy. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R777.pdf |
Contacts
Evaluation |
Regino Chávez |
Denise Huang, Ph.D. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation 301 GSE & IS Bldg Los Angeles, CA 90095 Tel: 310-206-9642 Email: dhuang@cse.ucla.edu |
Program | Carla Sanger President and CEO LA’s BEST Office of the Mayor 200 N. Main Street, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: 213-847-3681 Fax: 485-6606 Email: csanger@mayor.lacity.org |
|
Profile Updated | April 4, 2012 |
Evaluation 5: The Impact of the LA’s BEST After School Enrichment Initiative on Subsequent Student Achievement and Performance
Evaluation Description
Evaluation Purpose | To examine the impact of participating in LA’s BEST over time. |
Evaluation Design | Quasi-Experimental: Data were collected on the school performance of LA’s BEST participants who were in second through fifth grades during the 1993–94 school year; participants were followed from 1993–94 through 1997–98. Youth were categorized into three program participation level groups for purposes of analysis: high (more than 75% days present), medium (26–76% days present), and low (less than 25% days present). Participants’ school performance was compared to a group of similar youth who did not participate in LA’s BEST. |
Data Collection Methods |
Secondary Sources/Data Review: Data were collected on the rate at which students were redesignated as fully proficient in English, school absence rates, course-taking patterns, and rates of student mobility (transiency). Tests/Assessments: Scores from the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills and the Stanford-9 Achievement Test in reading math and language arts were reviewed. |
Data Collection Timeframe | Data were collected on the 1993–94 school year (when participants were in the second grade) through the 1997–98 school year (when participants were in the fifth grade). |
Findings:
Summative/Outcome Findings
Academic |
Longer-term program participation was significantly related to positive achievement on standardized tests of mathematics, reading, and language arts when the influence of gender, ethnicity, income, and language status was controlled for. More program participation was related to better subsequent program attendance when the influence of gender, ethnicity, income, and language status was controlled for. Higher levels of program participation led to better subsequent school attendance, which, in turn, related to higher academic achievement on standardized tests of mathematics, reading, and language arts. Language redesignation rates favored LA’s BEST participants when compared with non-LA’s BEST youth for fourth-, sixth-, and eighth-grade data. No significant differences were found in comparing performance for grades 5 and 7. Absence data for the fifth-grade group (1994–95) showed that youth who participated in LA’s BEST had significantly fewer absences in grades 6 and 7, although no differences were detected in grades 8 and 9. Although in the initial year LA’s BEST youth began with mathematics achievement scores significantly lower than those of nonparticipants, in 1997–98 those differences no longer existed. |