You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.

www.HFRP.org

The Harvard Family Research Project separated from the Harvard Graduate School of Education to become the Global Family Research Project as of January 1, 2017. It is no longer affiliated with Harvard University.

Terms of Use ▼


Program Description

Overview The LA’s BEST (Better Educated Students for Tomorrow) Program is an afterschool program that serves elementary-school-aged youth in Los Angeles, California. The program provides youth with a safe environment, enhanced opportunities through integrated educational supports, educational enrichment activities to supplement and deepen the regular program, recreational activities, and interpersonal skills and self-esteem development.
Start Date 1988
Scope local
Type afterschool
Location urban
Setting public schools
Participants elementary school students
Number of Sites/Grantees 186 elementary schools
Number Served 28,000 per year
Components The program is available from the end of the school day until 6 pm, Monday through Friday, at no cost to parents. In addition, numerous citywide events and field trips are scheduled on weekends. To attend, youth must enroll in the program and are expected to participate on a regular basis.
Funding Level $36 million (2009–2010)
Funding Sources City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Unified School District, private sector, private foundations, 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) program, California Department of Education, other federal grants, and private individuals


Evaluation

Overview Beginning in the 1989–90 school year, a series of evaluation studies has been conducted that examine the program’s implementation and impact.
Evaluator(s) Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California, Los Angeles
Evaluations Profiled Evaluation Report, March 1, 1990

Evaluation Report, July 31, 1991

Final Evaluation Report, December 17, 1993

Final Evaluation Report: Longitudinal Study, 1992–94

The impact of the LA’s BEST after school enrichment initiative on subsequent student achievement and performance

Examining the Relationship between Afterschool Staff-Based Social Capital and Student Engagement in LA’s BEST

Exploring the Relationships between LA’s BEST Program Attendance and Cognitive Gains of LA’s BEST Students

Exploring the Effect of Afterschool Participation on Students’ Collaboration Skills, Oral Communication Skills, and Self-Efficacy
Evaluations Planned The Center for the Study of Evaluation team continues to evaluate the role of LA’s BEST in supporting youth’s academic and social development. The Center is currently conducting an exploratory study on the first year of LA’s BEST summer schools’ impact on language development—due June 30, 2012.
Report Availability

Brooks, P. E., Valdes, R. M., Herman, J. L., & Baker, E. L. (1990). Evaluation report, March 1, 1990: LA’s BEST after school education and enrichment program. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California–Los Angeles.

Brooks, P. E., & Herman, J. L. (1991). Evaluation report, July 31, 1991: LA’s BEST an after school education and enrichment program. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California–Los Angeles.

Brooks, P. E., & Forman, R. (1993). Final evaluation report, December 17, 1993: LA’s BEST an after school education and enrichment program. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California–Los Angeles.

Brooks, P. E., Mojica, C. M., & Land, R. E. (1995). Final evaluation report: Longitudinal study of LA’s BEST after school education and enrichment program, 1992–94. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California–Los Angeles.

Huang, D., Gribbons, B., Kim, K. S., Lee, C., & Baker, E. L. (2000). A decade of results: The impact of the LA’s BEST after school enrichment initiative on subsequent student achievement and performance. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.pasesetter.com/reframe/documents/uclaeval.pdf

Huang, D., Choi, K., Davis, D., Henderson, T., Kim, K. Lin, S., et al. (2003). Evaluating the impact of LA’s BEST on students’ social and academic development: Study of 74 LA’s BEST Sites 2001–2002 final report. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles.

Huang, D., Choi, K., Henderson, T., Howe, J., Kim, K., Vogel, M., et al. (2004). Evaluating the impact of LA’s BEST on students’ social and academic development: Study of 100 LA’s BEST Sites 2002–2003. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles.

Huang, D. (2004). Exploring the long-term impact of LA’s BEST on students’ social and academic development. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles.

Huang, D., Kim, K. S., Marshall, A., & Perez, P. (2005). Keeping kids in school: An LA’s BEST example—A study examining the long-term impact of LA’s BEST on students’ dropout rates. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles.

Huang, D. (2005). Evaluating the effects of academic skills and academic enablers taught at LA’s BEST on the achievement of student participants. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles.

Peppler, K. A., & Catterall, J. S. (2006). Year two evaluation of the LA’s BEST After School Arts Program: Evaluating student learning in the arts. Los Angeles: Graduate School of Education & Information Studies. University of California–Los Angeles.

Goldsmidt, P., Huang, D., & Chinen, M. (2007). The long-term effects of after-school programming on educational adjustment and juvenile crime: A study of the LA’s BEST after-school program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Huang, D., Coordt, A., La Torre, D., Leon, S., Miyoshi, J., Pérez, P., & Peterson, C. (2007). The afterschool hours: Examining the relationship between afterschool staff-based social capital and student engagement in LA’s BEST (CSE Technical Report 712). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R712.pdf

Huang, D., Miyoshi, J., La Torre, D., Marshall, A., Perez, P., & Peterson, C. (2007). Exploring the intellectual, social and organizational capitals at LA’s BEST (CSE Technical Report 714). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R714.pdf

Huang, D., Leon, S., La Torre, D., & Mostafavi, S. (2008). Examining the relationship between LA’s BEST program attendance and academic achievement of LA’s BEST students (CRESST Report 749). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R749.pdf

Huang, D., La Torre, D., Duong, N., Huber, L. P., Leon, S., & Oh, C. (2009). A circle of learning: Children and adults growing together in LA’s BEST (CRESST Report 758). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R758.pdf

Huang, D., Leon, S., Harven, A. M., La Torre, D., & Mostafavi, S. (2009). Exploring the relationships between LA’s BEST Program attendance and cognitive gains of LA’s BEST students (CRESST Report 757). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R757.pdf

Huang, D., Leon, S., Hodson, C., La Torre, D., Obregon, N., & Rivera, G. (2010). Preparing students for the 21st Century: Exploring the effect of afterschool participation on students’ collaboration skills, oral communication skills, and self-efficacy. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R777.pdf


Contacts

Evaluation

Regino Chávez
Director of Evaluation
LA’s BEST
711 E. 14th Place
Los Angeles, CA 90021
Tel: 213-745-1900 x52995
Email: reginoc@lasbest.lausd.net

Denise Huang, Ph.D.
National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)
UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation
301 GSE & IS Bldg
Los Angeles, CA 90095
Tel: 310-206-9642
Email: dhuang@cse.ucla.edu
Program Carla Sanger
President and CEO
LA’s BEST
Office of the Mayor
200 N. Main Street, Suite 700   
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: 213-847-3681
Fax: 485-6606
Email: csanger@mayor.lacity.org
 
Profile Updated April 4, 2012  


Evaluation 5: The Impact of the LA’s BEST After School Enrichment Initiative on Subsequent Student Achievement and Performance



Evaluation Description

Evaluation Purpose To examine the impact of participating in LA’s BEST over time.
Evaluation Design Quasi-Experimental: Data were collected on the school performance of LA’s BEST participants who were in second through fifth grades during the 1993–94 school year; participants were followed from 1993–94 through 1997–98. Youth were categorized into three program participation level groups for purposes of analysis: high (more than 75% days present), medium (26–76% days present), and low (less than 25% days present). Participants’ school performance was compared to a group of similar youth who did not participate in LA’s BEST.
Data Collection Methods

Secondary Sources/Data Review: Data were collected on the rate at which students were redesignated as fully proficient in English, school absence rates, course-taking patterns, and rates of student mobility (transiency).

Tests/Assessments: Scores from the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills and the Stanford-9 Achievement Test in reading math and language arts were reviewed.

Data Collection Timeframe Data were collected on the 1993–94 school year (when participants were in the second grade) through the 1997–98 school year (when participants were in the fifth grade).

 

Findings:
Summative/Outcome Findings

Academic

Longer-term program participation was significantly related to positive achievement on standardized tests of mathematics, reading, and language arts when the influence of gender, ethnicity, income, and language status was controlled for.

More program participation was related to better subsequent program attendance when the influence of gender, ethnicity, income, and language status was controlled for.

Higher levels of program participation led to better subsequent school attendance, which, in turn, related to higher academic achievement on standardized tests of mathematics, reading, and language arts.

Language redesignation rates favored LA’s BEST participants when compared with non-LA’s BEST youth for fourth-, sixth-, and eighth-grade data. No significant differences were found in comparing performance for grades 5 and 7.

Absence data for the fifth-grade group (1994–95) showed that youth who participated in LA’s BEST had significantly fewer absences in grades 6 and 7, although no differences were detected in grades 8 and 9.

Although in the initial year LA’s BEST youth began with mathematics achievement scores significantly lower than those of nonparticipants, in 1997–98 those differences no longer existed.

© 2016 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College
Published by Harvard Family Research Project