You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.

www.HFRP.org

The Harvard Family Research Project separated from the Harvard Graduate School of Education to become the Global Family Research Project as of January 1, 2017. It is no longer affiliated with Harvard University.

Terms of Use ▼


Program Description

Overview The LA’s BEST (Better Educated Students for Tomorrow) Program is an afterschool program that serves elementary-school-aged youth in Los Angeles, California. The program provides youth with a safe environment, enhanced opportunities through integrated educational supports, educational enrichment activities to supplement and deepen the regular program, recreational activities, and interpersonal skills and self-esteem development.
Start Date 1988
Scope local
Type afterschool
Location urban
Setting public schools
Participants elementary school students
Number of Sites/Grantees 186 elementary schools
Number Served 28,000 per year
Components The program is available from the end of the school day until 6 pm, Monday through Friday, at no cost to parents. In addition, numerous citywide events and field trips are scheduled on weekends. To attend, youth must enroll in the program and are expected to participate on a regular basis.
Funding Level $36 million (2009–2010)
Funding Sources City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Unified School District, private sector, private foundations, 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) program, California Department of Education, other federal grants, and private individuals


Evaluation

Overview Beginning in the 1989–90 school year, a series of evaluation studies has been conducted that examine the program’s implementation and impact.
Evaluator(s) Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California, Los Angeles
Evaluations Profiled Evaluation Report, March 1, 1990

Evaluation Report, July 31, 1991

Final Evaluation Report, December 17, 1993

Final Evaluation Report: Longitudinal Study, 1992–94

The impact of the LA’s BEST after school enrichment initiative on subsequent student achievement and performance

Examining the Relationship between Afterschool Staff-Based Social Capital and Student Engagement in LA’s BEST

Exploring the Relationships between LA’s BEST Program Attendance and Cognitive Gains of LA’s BEST Students

Exploring the Effect of Afterschool Participation on Students’ Collaboration Skills, Oral Communication Skills, and Self-Efficacy
Evaluations Planned The Center for the Study of Evaluation team continues to evaluate the role of LA’s BEST in supporting youth’s academic and social development. The Center is currently conducting an exploratory study on the first year of LA’s BEST summer schools’ impact on language development—due June 30, 2012.
Report Availability

Brooks, P. E., Valdes, R. M., Herman, J. L., & Baker, E. L. (1990). Evaluation report, March 1, 1990: LA’s BEST after school education and enrichment program. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California–Los Angeles.

Brooks, P. E., & Herman, J. L. (1991). Evaluation report, July 31, 1991: LA’s BEST an after school education and enrichment program. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California–Los Angeles.

Brooks, P. E., & Forman, R. (1993). Final evaluation report, December 17, 1993: LA’s BEST an after school education and enrichment program. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California–Los Angeles.

Brooks, P. E., Mojica, C. M., & Land, R. E. (1995). Final evaluation report: Longitudinal study of LA’s BEST after school education and enrichment program, 1992–94. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California–Los Angeles.

Huang, D., Gribbons, B., Kim, K. S., Lee, C., & Baker, E. L. (2000). A decade of results: The impact of the LA’s BEST after school enrichment initiative on subsequent student achievement and performance. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.pasesetter.com/reframe/documents/uclaeval.pdf

Huang, D., Choi, K., Davis, D., Henderson, T., Kim, K. Lin, S., et al. (2003). Evaluating the impact of LA’s BEST on students’ social and academic development: Study of 74 LA’s BEST Sites 2001–2002 final report. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles.

Huang, D., Choi, K., Henderson, T., Howe, J., Kim, K., Vogel, M., et al. (2004). Evaluating the impact of LA’s BEST on students’ social and academic development: Study of 100 LA’s BEST Sites 2002–2003. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles.

Huang, D. (2004). Exploring the long-term impact of LA’s BEST on students’ social and academic development. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles.

Huang, D., Kim, K. S., Marshall, A., & Perez, P. (2005). Keeping kids in school: An LA’s BEST example—A study examining the long-term impact of LA’s BEST on students’ dropout rates. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles.

Huang, D. (2005). Evaluating the effects of academic skills and academic enablers taught at LA’s BEST on the achievement of student participants. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles.

Peppler, K. A., & Catterall, J. S. (2006). Year two evaluation of the LA’s BEST After School Arts Program: Evaluating student learning in the arts. Los Angeles: Graduate School of Education & Information Studies. University of California–Los Angeles.

Goldsmidt, P., Huang, D., & Chinen, M. (2007). The long-term effects of after-school programming on educational adjustment and juvenile crime: A study of the LA’s BEST after-school program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Huang, D., Coordt, A., La Torre, D., Leon, S., Miyoshi, J., Pérez, P., & Peterson, C. (2007). The afterschool hours: Examining the relationship between afterschool staff-based social capital and student engagement in LA’s BEST (CSE Technical Report 712). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R712.pdf

Huang, D., Miyoshi, J., La Torre, D., Marshall, A., Perez, P., & Peterson, C. (2007). Exploring the intellectual, social and organizational capitals at LA’s BEST (CSE Technical Report 714). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R714.pdf

Huang, D., Leon, S., La Torre, D., & Mostafavi, S. (2008). Examining the relationship between LA’s BEST program attendance and academic achievement of LA’s BEST students (CRESST Report 749). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R749.pdf

Huang, D., La Torre, D., Duong, N., Huber, L. P., Leon, S., & Oh, C. (2009). A circle of learning: Children and adults growing together in LA’s BEST (CRESST Report 758). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R758.pdf

Huang, D., Leon, S., Harven, A. M., La Torre, D., & Mostafavi, S. (2009). Exploring the relationships between LA’s BEST Program attendance and cognitive gains of LA’s BEST students (CRESST Report 757). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R757.pdf

Huang, D., Leon, S., Hodson, C., La Torre, D., Obregon, N., & Rivera, G. (2010). Preparing students for the 21st Century: Exploring the effect of afterschool participation on students’ collaboration skills, oral communication skills, and self-efficacy. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California–Los Angeles. Available at: www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R777.pdf


Contacts

Evaluation

Regino Chávez
Director of Evaluation
LA’s BEST
711 E. 14th Place
Los Angeles, CA 90021
Tel: 213-745-1900 x52995
Email: reginoc@lasbest.lausd.net

Denise Huang, Ph.D.
National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)
UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation
301 GSE & IS Bldg
Los Angeles, CA 90095
Tel: 310-206-9642
Email: dhuang@cse.ucla.edu
Program Carla Sanger
President and CEO
LA’s BEST
Office of the Mayor
200 N. Main Street, Suite 700   
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: 213-847-3681
Fax: 485-6606
Email: csanger@mayor.lacity.org
 
Profile Updated April 4, 2012  


Evaluation 2: Evaluation Report, July 31, 1991



Evaluation Description

Evaluation Purpose To describe selected characteristics, services, operations, and perceived effects of the LA’s BEST program; to explore selected issues raised in earlier evaluation studies; to provide a range of data for program enhancement and improvement; and to generate recommendations for improving program quality.
Evaluation Design Non-Experimental: School principal, site coordinator, and on-site surveys were collected at the 19 LA’s BEST sites in operation during the 1990–91 school year. Eight of these sites were randomly selected for intensive data collection, which included structured interviews with youth participants and parents; informal interviews with community representatives, program coordinators, and project directors; school performance data; police information; and surveys of LA’s BEST staff.
Data Collection Methods

Interviews/Focus Groups: Program participant interviews gathered information about the afterschool activities in which youth would have engaged had the program not been available, and perceptions of the program, including its activities, safety, and staff.

Parent interviews gathered information about afterschool care activities and costs prior to the program, perceptions about LA’s BEST staff and programming, parent involvement in the program, effects of the program on their children, and demographics.

Secondary Source/Data Review: Data related to school performance included grades, absences, tardiness, and English as a Second Language status. Police information included statistics on arrests and criminal activities in neighborhoods surrounding the eight intensive study sites.

Surveys/Questionnaires: Principal surveys gathered information about satisfaction with afterschool staff, effectiveness of the program, program accomplishments, others’ reactions to the program, and the usefulness of other types of programming.

Site coordinator surveys gathered information about satisfaction with staff, hiring problems, program components and effectiveness, participants’ responses to the program, level of support from others, and recommendations for youth who should be in the program but were not.

Staff surveys gathered information about program effectiveness, participants’ responses to the program, quality of work environment, training, and recommendations for youth who should be in the program but were not.

The on-site survey gathered information about program attendance, release procedures, staffing, staff training, and implementation.

Data Collection Timeframe Data were collected between September 1990 and July 1991.


Findings:
Formative/Process Findings

Activity Implementation According to parents, youth, school-day teachers, principals, and program staff, LA’s BEST was successful in creating environments in which inner city children experienced the larger world.
Program Context/ Infrastructure Over the year, LA’s BEST successfully added four new sites. Proportionally, more sites offered more major program components, more sites offered a broader array of activities within each of the major program components, and there were fewer “weaker” sites in the program and more solidly operating, strong programs.

© 2016 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College
Published by Harvard Family Research Project