You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.

www.HFRP.org

The Harvard Family Research Project separated from the Harvard Graduate School of Education to become the Global Family Research Project as of January 1, 2017. It is no longer affiliated with Harvard University.

Terms of Use ▼


Program Description

Overview The 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) program, authorized under the federal Elementary and Secondary School Act, provides expanded learning opportunities for participating children in a safe, drug-free, and supervised environment. Administered by the U.S. Department of Education, states receive funding to allocate to local educational agencies.
Start Date 1997
Scope national
Type after school, summer/vacation, before school, weekend, comprehensive services
Location urban, rural
Setting public schools
Participants elementary and middle school students
Number of Sites/Grantees 7,500 rural and inner-city public schools in more than 1,400 communities (2002)
Number Served 1.2 million children and youth and 400,000 adults (2001)
Components Programs receiving 21st CCLC funds must provide a variety of activities that offer high-quality expanded learning opportunities for youth in the community and that contribute to reduced drug use and violence. Grantees must also carry out at least four of the following activities: literacy education programs; senior citizen programs; children's day care services; integrated education, health, social service, recreational, or cultural programs; summer and weekend school programs in conjunction with recreation programs; nutrition and health programs; expanded library service hours to serve community needs; telecommunications and technology education programs for individuals of all ages; parenting skills education programs; support and training for child day care providers; employment counseling, training, and placement services for individuals who leave school before graduating from secondary school; and services for individuals with disabilities. In order to receive grant money, the legislation states that applicants must collaborate with other community-based organizations, related public agencies, businesses, or other appropriate organizations.
Funding Level $846 million (FY 2001); $1 billion (FY 2002)
Funding Sources US Department of Education
Other Through a unique public-private partnership, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation is complementing the work of the US Department of Education by providing technical assistance to help 21st CCLC grantees develop, implement, and sustain high-quality after school programs. The Mott foundation also supports the program by building public will for after school programs through a media campaign and supporting evaluation and research work in the field.


Evaluation

Overview The evaluation consists of an impact and an implementation evaluation of the 21st CCLC program. These evaluation components are funded by the US Department of Education. In addition, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation is providing support to supplement the Department of Education-funded studies and to conduct a series of special studies that will explore issues related to after school program access, services, and best practices. The foundation for this evaluation work is a logic model, based on available research and practice knowledge that lays out the hypothesized relationship between program context, program implementation, intermediate effects, and long-term effects.
Evaluator Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. and Decision Information Resources, Inc.
Evaluations Profiled When Schools Stay Open Late: The National Evaluation of the 21st-Century Community Learning Centers Program, First Year Findings

Study of After School Time Use: 2000–2002
Evaluations Planned The evaluators currently are collecting another year of follow-up data and have expanded the study to include more programs serving elementary school students. The additional data from the second follow-up year and from the newly included programs will be the basis for two future reports. The first will update the findings for middle school students using another year of follow-up data and will present first-year findings for elementary school students using a larger number of elementary school programs. The second will update the findings for elementary school students using another year of follow-up data.

Also, Deborah Vandell of the University of Wisconsin is conducting a separate study entitled, Study of After School Time Use: 2000–2002.
Report Availability U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary. (2003). When schools stay open late: The national evaluation of the 21st-Century Learning Centers program, first year findings. Washington, DC, Author. Available at www.ed.gov/pubs/21cent/firstyear.

Moore, M., Dynarksi, M., Mullens, J., James-Burdumy, S., & Rosenberg, L. (2000). Enhancing the 21st-Century Community Learning Centers evaluation: A concept paper. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.


Contacts

Evaluation Mark Dynarski, Ph.D.
Mary Moore, Ph.D.
Principal Investigators
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
P.O. Box 2393
Princeton, NJ 08543-2393
Tel: 609-799-3535
Email: mdynarski@mathematica-mpr.com
  Betsy Warner
Project Officer
Planning and Evaluation Service
US Department of Education
400 Maryland Ave., SW
Washington, DC 20202
Tel: 202-401-3600
Email: elizabeth_warner@ed.gov
Program Robert Stonehill
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education
US Department of Education
400 Maryland Ave., SW
Washington, DC 20208-5524
Tel: 202-260-9737
Email: rstonehi@inet.ed.gov
Profile Updated April 25, 2003

Evaluation 2: Study of After School Time Use: 2000–2002



Evaluation Description

Evaluation Purpose To examine student experiences in 21st CCLC after school programs with a focus on issues such as: the frequency of quality interactions between participants and staff, the level of participant engagement in program activities, and the type of quality practices taking place in programs. The study is being conducted by Deborah Vandell and colleagues at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and funded by the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation.
Evaluation Design Quasi-Experimental: The time-use study will examine the experiences of a sample of students in two of the Mott middle school sites in Madison, Wisconsin. The sample size is expected to be about 150 students participating in after school programs. A comparison group of about 100 nonparticipating students will be selected to compare the after school experiences of these two groups and their outcomes.
Data Collection Methods Document Review: The time-use study will use a method called experience sampling in which students in the study will be given wristwatches that are programmed to beep 35 times over a seven-day period. When beeped, students will record information about where they are, whom they are with, the activities they are involved in, their level of involvement or engagement, and their affect or emotion.
Data Collection Timeframe Data were collected from each study member during two one-week periods in the 2001–2002 school year.

© 2016 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College
Published by Harvard Family Research Project